Cool Lipo Vs. Cool Sculpting: Which is Better?

Fat loss has come a long way in recent years with new non-invasive procedures. In recent years there have been two alternatives to traditional liposuction, many enticing patients, especially those who do not want incisions and are afraid of healing complications.

These two are Cool Lipo and Cool Sculpting. In this article, we’ll look at the differences and similarities between them so you can decide which procedure is proper for you. If you want to be more enlightened about cosmetic procedures and get expert advice, you can also visit local clinics nearby.

Now let us look closer at the core comparisons of cool Lipo and cool Sculpting.

Differences Between The Two Cool Non-Invasive Beauty Procedures

Here is a list of differences between Cool Lipo and Cool Sculpting that can show which option is better for you.

Technology

Doctors use a “Cool Lipo” laser method to eliminate stubborn fat. The laser radiation kills the fat cells, which the body will flush out later.

On the other hand, a doctor will use a “Cool Sculpting” applicator that freezes the fat cells in an automatically controlled way. That means it’s safer since it only burns the fat, not the neighboring tissue. After the fat freezes, the body will also flush the fat away.

You can get to the nitty-gritty of the technology behind cool Lipo from expert resources. You can visit this informational page at www.NewImprovedBody.com from the St. Louis Cool Lipo for professional advice if this procedure is for you.

Anesthesia

In Cool Lipo, a doctor will use local anesthesia to numb the treatment area and reduce discomfort during the procedure. They will deliver it through a series of injections into the treatment area, which takes 5-30 minutes.

In contrast, Cool Sculpting does not require any anesthesia or any other products applied to the skin.

Target Area

Both procedures are helpful for areas with stubborn fat, such as the following:

  • Neck
  • Abdomen
  • Thighs
  • Back
  • Arms
  • Love Handles
  • Bra Bulge
  • Inner and Outer Knee

But the difference is that Cool Lipo treats multiple problem areas in a single session. On the other hand, Cool Sculpting is limited to treating one place only per session. So, if you have multiple problem areas, you must book several Cool Sculpting sessions to treat each.

Procedure Time

Another difference between Cool Lipo and Cool Sculpting is the procedure time. Both session procedures can take one to two hours. But Cool Lipo may have additional 30 minutes to an hour for local anesthesia.

Downtime

Most people need two days to recover from Cool Lipo. Take it easy and avoid doing anything too hard during this time.

On the other hand, Cool Sculpting has less downtime, and most people can return to their normal activities immediately.

Effectiveness

Cool Lipo is an excellent way to change the shape of your body because it not only gets rid of fat but also tightens the skin in the treated area.

Cool Sculpting is inherently safer because it only burns the fat, not the other tissue around it. But cool Lipo can be safe if the doctor uses the laser in the proper direction.

Side Effects

Everyone can have different experiences, and the side effects will depend on the person and the procedure. Talking to your doctor or nurse about your worries before the process is always best. But here are the two procedures’ most common side effects:

Cool Lipo:

  • Pain and discomfort during the procedure (local anesthetic is used)
  • Swelling, bruising, and redness around the treated area
  • Temporary numbness or tingling in the treated area
  • Risk of infection, scarring, or skin damage if the procedure is not performed correctly

CoolSculpting:

  • Temporary redness, swelling, or tenderness in the treated area
  • Numbness or tingling in the treated area, which usually resolves within a few weeks
  • Rare reports of skin irritation or skin sensitivity
  • Mild discomfort during the procedure, which can be managed with over-the-counter pain medications

Costs

The cost of Cool Sculpting and Cool Lipo depends on location, doctor expertise, and how many and how big is the problem area. But here is the average cost of each procedure:

  • Cool Lipo can cost anywhere from $3,000 to $8,000.
  • CoolSculpting costs between $1,000 and $4,000.

Cool Lipo costs more than Cool Sculpting because it uses a laser and anesthesia.

Questions To Ask Yourself: Which is The Better Cool Beauty Procedure?

Here is a list of questions you can ask yourself to understand your goals and needs for relaxed non-invasive fat-burning sessions.

Here is a list of questions you can ask yourself to understand your goals and needs for relaxed non-invasive fat-burning sessions.

Areas of concern

  • Which areas of your body are you looking to target?
  • Are there specific areas where you have stubborn fat that you would like to eliminate?
  • Do you want to eliminate fat in multiple areas during one session?

Time frame

  • How long are you willing to see results?
  • Do you have time for multiple sessions or prefer a quicker outcome?

Comfort level

  • Are you comfortable with undergoing a procedure that requires a local anesthetic?
  • Or would you prefer a non-invasive procedure with little to no discomfort?

Downtime

  • How long will you take off for recovery and healing after the procedure?
  • Are your outside commitments ready for your recovery time?

Budget

  • Do you have the budget for the procedure?
  • Can you sustain your lifestyle after the process?
  • Do you have the budget for costs outside the procedure, such as transportation, potential caretakers for outside responsibilities, or other things the doctor may require?

Results

  • How much improvement will you see in your appearance after the procedure?
  • Do you want a subtle change or a more dramatic transformation?

Maintenance

  • Are you willing to eat healthier after procedures?
  • Are you willing to exercise now and then to keep the results?
  • Will you monitor and discipline yourself after the procedure?

A Cool Effortless Beauty

Cool Sculpting and Cool Lipo aren’t just about how much the procedure costs. The best procedure will depend on your time, goals, needs, and budget. Remember that time and knowledge are also wealth. For instance, one can save you more time or is safer for your body. After self-assessment, it’s best to ask a certified doctor to choose the best treatment.

 

 

 

Hot this week

Cartessa Aesthetics Partners with Classys to Bring EVERESSE to the U.S. Market

Classys, which is listed on the KOSDAQ, is one of South Korea's most distinguished aesthetic technology manufacturers, with devices distributed in 80+ markets globally. This partnership marks Classys's official entry into the American marketplace, with Cartessa Aesthetics as the exclusive distributor for EVERESSE, launched under the Volnewmer brand in current global markets.

Stryker Launches Next-Generation of SurgiCount+

Now integrated with Stryker's Triton technology, SurgiCount+ addresses two key challenges: retained surgical sponges and blood loss assessment. Integrating these previously separate digital solutions provides the added benefit of a more efficient, streamlined workflow for hospitals notes Stryker.

Nevro Receives CE Mark In Europe for It’s HFX iQ™ Spinal Cord Stimulation System

Nevro notes HFX iQ is the first and only SCS system with artificial intelligence (AI) technology that combines high-frequency (10 kHz) therapy built on landmark evidence that uses ongoing cloud data insights to deliver personalized pain relief

Recor Medical Reports: CMS Grants Distinct TPT Device Code and Category to Recor Medical for Ultrasound Renal Denervation

The approval of TPT offers incremental reimbursement payments for outpatient procedures performed with ultrasound renal denervation for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. It becomes effective January 1, 2025, and is expected to remain effective for up to three years notes Recor Medical.

Jupiter Endovascular Reports | 1st U.S. Patient Treated with Jupiter Shape-shifting Thrombectomy Device

“Navigation challenges during endovascular procedures are often underappreciated and have led to under-adoption of life-saving procedures, such as pulmonary embolectomy. We have purpose-built our Endoportal Control technology to solve these issues and make important endovascular procedures accessible to more clinicians and their patients who can benefit from them,” said Carl J. St. Bernard, Jupiter Endovascular CEO. “This first case in the U.S. could not have gone better, and appears to validate the safety and performance we are seeing in our currently-enrolling European SPIRARE I study.”