Escaping the “Valley of Death”— The Funding Process for Biotechnology Companies

Funding Process for Biotechnology Companies

By Christopher J. Calhoun, Chairman & CEO of PARACRINE

Innovative biotechnology companies have the potential to transform healthcare, developing new therapies that may improve, as well as extend, the lives of patients.  To deliver on this promise is an epic journey that may take one to two decades, unimaginable amounts of cash, and surviving the notorious valley of death.

Discovery Euphoria

It all begins with a discovery typically coming out of grant funded research in academia. The startup is born and oftentimes supported through ‘seed’ funding from friends and family.  The sexiest technologies that elicit exciting promise of new scientific frontiers (think CRISPR) or the next silver bullet that may cure a specific disease (like CAR T-cell therapy engineered for a specific type of cancer) can shoot these new company valuations into the stratosphere.  Venture investors compete to find the next unicorn (companies with a valuation > $1 billion) and are willing to place smart bets on the most promising discoveries.  Despite the fact that these early biotechnologies are unproven with virtually zero clinical data, company valuations soar as they are fueled by a “hope premium” characteristic to the promise driving Discovery Euphoria.

Escaping the “Valley of Death”— The Funding Process for Biotechnology Companies

The “Hope Premium”

The initial surge of funding for biotechnologies comes right at the beginning, at the discovery stage. At this point, the therapy is still at the benchtop: no animal testing or human studies have been done to prove its effectiveness, and therefore no safety issues have come to light.  Investors at this stage are trading on a “hope premium” that’s based solely on the idea of the potential of the product, since they have no concrete proof on its safety or effectiveness.  Companies may raise tens of millions and recently, even hundreds of millions of dollars at this stage without treating a single patient; however, difficult times are just around the corner.

The “Valley of Death”

Discovery euphoria quickly fades as the company quietly gets to work transitioning from benchtop to pre-clinical (animal) research.  Utilizing its new pile of capital, the company expands by adding people, facilities, and often new targets or technology into the pipeline.  Advancing through pre-clinical studies and then human clinical trials is the major focus.  This early development period is abundant with risk across all fronts that may threaten the feasibility of the technology and even the viability of the company.

The cash begins to flow, or rather to flow out.  Losses accumulate and the amount of cash in the bank evaporates – otherwise described as the burn rate.  There is a constant race to achieve meaningful milestones that de-risk the technology and demonstrate progress to unlock access to the next tranche of essential capital to march forward before the current cash is gone.  This iterative cycle may continue at this stage for five to ten years leading to investor fatigue, shareholder dilution and an increasing cost of capital as valuations often suffer from the long road across the valley of death pitted with the inevitable, often unexpected landmines that can disrupt progress and even risk survival.  Countless carcasses scatter the landscape across the valley of death.  Few survive the gauntlet.

The Value Inflection Point

Success in early human safety studies, also known as Phase I or Phase I/IIa trials, may provide a new source of tailwind to push forward, but typically this isn’t enough to elevate depressed valuations as significant risks remain with larger, longer, higher costs trials ahead. The majority of investors and strategic partners wait for results from the next step: Phase II/IIB clinical trials before committing significant capital.

Positive Phase II/IIB clinical trial data triggers a value inflection point that may benefit from two parallel forces.  First, the investor base may expand to include a large new class of institutional investors that invest in late-stage biotech companies.  Increasing demand for and higher trading volume of company stock will increase share price as new investors build a position in the company.  Second, large strategic players are always on the hunt for promising products to add to their portfolio.  Typically, ‘strategics’ look for positive Phase II/IIB data as the entry point for partnership or acquisition, as the risk profile has been substantially reduced.  With a limited number of viable technologies with robust Phase II/IIB data, competition may be intense for high quality product candidates, further driving up value.

Late-stage Development and Market Entry

Now that the company has successfully navigated the valley of death, management can focus on late-stage trials and prepare for commercialization. The company should be well positioned to secure additional capital or a strategic partner to advance through the final clinical trials to market approval and to deliver on the promise to both patients and shareholders.

Editor’s Note: Christopher J. Calhoun is Chairman & CEO of PARACRINE, a biotechnology company developing the world’s first autologous, device-based disease modifying cell therapy for chronic conditions into late (approval) stage clinical trials based on robust prior clinical data.

 

 

 

 

Hot this week

How AI is Transforming Vision Care | By Matthias Hofmann, Co-founder & CEO of Eyebot

"The way we think about healthcare is evolving rapidly. From AI-assisted diagnostics to telehealth expansion, technology is breaking down barriers and reshaping how people access essential medical services. In eyecare, artificial intelligence is increasingly redefining accessibility, affordability, and accuracy in vision care," writes Matthias Hofmann.

Virtual Reality In Telehealth: Improving Therapy, Pain Management, and Medical Training | By Lindsay Dymowski Constantino, President Centennial Pharmacy Services

While virtual reality in telehealth might seem like a novel technology to incorporate into healthcare, at least one portion of our field has been using it for 250 years. Simulation technology has long been instrumental in medical training since it makes failure safe while students practice key skills.

Knee Osteoarthritis and How Retraining Gait Alleviates Pain | By Cliff Bleustein, MD, MBA — Global President, CEO, and Director at AposHealth, & Adjunct...

According to recent research, 15% of the global population over the age of 30 is affected by osteoarthritis, or OA, the most common form of arthritis. This same study projects that OA will affect nearly 1 billion people by the year 2050. These statistics show that OA is a pressing medical concern that should be a top priority for medical professionals seeking to improve their patients’ quality of life.

6 Month Real World Experience Study Confirms Efficacy and Safety of SING IMT ® for Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Published in the journal Heliyon, the new study found that SING IMT improved both distance and near vision — while exhibiting minimal effects on corneal endothelial cell density and a favorable safety profile.

Putting an End to Infusion Confusion with Smart, Simple Solutions | By Rodney W Schutt

Mr. Schutt writes: "Nurses, clinicians, and caregivers across the globe are busier and under more stress than ever before. Every day, they are expected to provide increasingly high-quality care while their resource levels remain woefully inadequate. When managing a high volume of patients, nurses face constant physical and mental strain that can quickly lead to burnout, in a space where even minor clinical errors can be harmful, even fatal."