New Approach to Clinical Trial Design Helps Medical Devices Better Meet Patient Needs and Priorities

Science of Patient Input Provides a Systematic Approach to Collect, Analyze, and Apply Patient Preferences into the Medical Device Development and Regulatory Process

A Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) program today released a new framework that provides U.S. medical device companies a systematic approach for patient-focused clinical trial design to better meet patient needs and priorities.

The Science of Patient Input (SPI), with representatives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), patient advocacy groups, and the medical device industry, developed the approach so that the studies used to evaluate medical devices can better align with patients’ interests.

The patient-centered framework was developed to help inform researchers interested in conducting rigorous patient preference studies for medical device design, development, evaluation, and regulatory submissions. The approach is detailed in a new SPI framework, “Using Patient Preference Information in the Design of Clinical Trials.” The framework describes the first and only collection of scientifically rigorous methods for integrating patient preferences into clinical trial design.

According to MDIC Science of Patient Input (SPI) Program Director Kert Gunasekaran, “Scientific and technological advancements are accelerating device innovation, but ensuring access to those new therapies takes regulatory science. Our SPI program embraces the opportunity for industry to incorporate patient input more systematically into the process of developing products, enhancing our pathways to deliver unmet needs for patients, and ultimately speeding access to new therapies.”

Before approving a new medical device, regulators evaluate its safety and effectiveness, which includes consideration of the successful achievement of predetermined clinical trial results. To date, patients have had limited input on how clinical trial success is defined.

To ensure patient preferences are included, MDIC encourages clinical trial sponsors to incorporate patient perspectives into the total product life cycle, from research and development, to clinical trial design, and regulatory decision-making.

“Patient preferences may differ from those of clinicians and device manufacturers,” said Dr. Shelby Reed, professor of population health sciences and medicine at Duke University. “Patients and their families have a deep and personal understanding of what it’s like to live with a disease, and they often have valuable insights on how a device could affect their quality of life.”

Patient preference can often be contrary to conventional assumptions. Patient input may reveal patients’ willingness to take a substantial risk that the device may not work in exchange for the potential benefits. Conversely, patient input may suggest that a treatment must provide significant, not-yet-identified benefits before patients would be willing to accept the risk of a new approach.

Because there are unique challenges to this novel approach to collecting, analyzing, and applying patient preferences to clinical trial design, SPI has developed data-driven approaches for regulatory and clinical teams to:

  • Identify what matters most to patients
  • Measure patient input through proven qualitative and quantitative methodologies
  • Engage in advanced planning and communications with the FDA
  • Include patients in trial design, recruitment, and outcomes

Dr. Michelle Tarver, deputy director of the Office of Strategic Partnerships and Technology Innovation at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health at the FDA, highlights the importance of these considerations. “A patient-centered approach to the development and evaluation of medical devices along the total product life cycle can make an indelible impact on the lives of people living with serious health conditions. Advancing the work of measuring health preferences helps support our mission to assure patients have timely and continued access to medical devices of public health importance and to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of such devices.”

One of the methods reviewed by the framework includes using a Bayesian Decision Analysis (BDA) model, which can help adjust statistical modeling considerations that can impact the study’s optimal sample size and measurements for achieving the study’s goals.

Although BDA was developed decades ago, it was adapted to the patient-centered framework by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) professor Andrew Lo, who was involved in several case studies featured in the framework. “The goal is to go beyond statistical p-values to also measure patient values,” Dr. Lo said. “The BDA model can be used to compute the greatest good for the greatest number. It measures optimal risk and benefit trade-offs, which can vary widely based on the severity of a disease or the afflicted patient population.”

Potential Benefits of Incorporating SPI Into Clinical Trial Design

  • Clinical trial outcome data that matter to patients
  • Development of devices that patients find useful
  • Increased patient trust in medical devices
  • Clear patient preferences regarding risk/benefit of medical devices
  • Faster study/research participant recruitment, enrollment, and study completion
  • Greater study/research participation, resulting in decreased loss to follow-up
  • Streamlined data collection, resulting in better quality data
  • Fewer protocol revisions

Available Free to Support Medical Device Companies

The new framework provides key learnings and best practices derived from recent medical device case studies on Parkinson’s disease, heart failure, mitral valve disease, and obesity. The report is one of several free resources available from MDIC’s SPI to encourage medical device companies to incorporate patient perspectives across the total product development life cycle.

 

Hot this week

Jupiter Endovascular Reports | 1st U.S. Patient Treated with Jupiter Shape-shifting Thrombectomy Device

“Navigation challenges during endovascular procedures are often underappreciated and have led to under-adoption of life-saving procedures, such as pulmonary embolectomy. We have purpose-built our Endoportal Control technology to solve these issues and make important endovascular procedures accessible to more clinicians and their patients who can benefit from them,” said Carl J. St. Bernard, Jupiter Endovascular CEO. “This first case in the U.S. could not have gone better, and appears to validate the safety and performance we are seeing in our currently-enrolling European SPIRARE I study.”

Avery Dennison Medical Introduces Ipdated SilFoam Lite: Sustainability, MDR Certification & Performance Improvements

The newly enhanced SilFoam Lite delivers superior efficiency and reliability, bringing improved fluid handling capabilities and improved tack. These improvements make the product ideal for customers seeking quality, high-performance solutions in wound care notes Avery Dennison Medical.

Voluntary Recall Notifying Medtronic Insulin Pump Users of Potential Risks of Shortened Pump Battery Life

Medtronic plc voluntarily issued a field action starting on July 31, 2024, notifying global customers of its MiniMed™ 600 series or 700 series insulin pumps to follow their pump's built-in alerts and alarms for battery status and to contact Medtronic if they observe changes in the battery life of their pump

Medtronic Expands AiBLE Spine Surgery Ecosystem with New Technologies and Siemens Healthineers Partnership

New advancements in the AiBLE Spine Surgery ecosystem build upon the company's commitment to procedural innovation and execution

Axlab, Danish Medtech Pioneer, expands to US with Advanced Robotic Tissue Sectioning for Pathology Laboratories

Kris Rokke, National Sales Director for Axlab in the US. "My team and I are extremely excited and honored about this unique opportunity to also offer this advanced technology to labs across the US and thus contribute to the pathology labs of tomorrow."