Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Published Study Results: Cadaver Vs Simulator Based Arthroscopic Training in Shoulder Surgery

February 9, 2021

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Key study findings show 20% faster procedure time for simulation training, 30% less cartilage damage during simulation training, VR Simulators as effective as “gold standard” cadavers for training arthroscopic procedures.

It is estimated that 20,000 people a year in the US donate their bodies (cadavers) for scientific and medical training purposes. This has dramatically changed during COVID-19, with these types of training often canceled, understandably due to the constraints imposed to control the spread of the virus. Even before the pandemic, each cadaver has limited use for medical training, and cadaveric training is not permitted in many other countries, there is vast potential for the growth in technology for training.

Simulation training has been able to continue throughout the pandemic, and forecasts predict that there will be a further shift towards virtual and mixed reality simulators. The findings of a recent study strengthen the evidence base for medical establishments to rapidly transition to digital training solutions and furthermore strengthens the outlook for simulation training in a post-COVID future.

Modern simulators are so advanced that they can realistically simulate the key elements needed to teach a surgical procedure including representing the physical anatomy for joint manipulation and palpation, and on-demand pathologies and complications. This way physicians can repeat their training cases ad infinitum until proficiency. In addition, simulators provide quantitative and visual feedback on damage, which is not possible with cadavers.

The recent study led by Dr. Gazi Huri, the Turkish Academy of Science, Young Scientist Award Winner has highlighted the benefits of simulation training during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Trainees, undertaking the European Orthopaedics & Traumatology Education Platform accredited Shoulder Club International Cadaver Course, performed surgery on either donated cadavers or the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator. The results showed that course completion was 20% quicker and that cartilage showed significantly less damage (30%) when students trained, via simulation, proving that simulator training is a competent training technology for now and the future.

In the case of the Shoulder Club International Cadaver Course, VirtaMed simulators provided trainees with visual feedback on damage caused to shoulder cartilage. Trainees were, therefore, more aware and able to adjust and improve their techniques accordingly. As a result, there was 50% more damage caused to the cartilage by residents that had only used cadaveric training.

Can simulators be the replacement for cadavers in the future? With cadaver dissections still being seen as the golden standard for surgical training, their disadvantages have been highlighted during the pandemic – lack of replicability, lack of objective training metrics, and of course the potential safety issues of close contact training.

During 2020 and into this year, simulation training continued due to its flexibility and the ability to train with added safety measures in place. The aim of this study was to research the efficiency of using medical simulators in surgical training as a replacement for cadavers. The results showed that all students, both the cadaver and simulation groups, achieved the proficiency levels required to be competent in arthroscopic shoulder surgery, yet there were further positive outcomes from those training on the ArthoS™ simulator.

Dr. Gazi Huri, Associate Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology at Hacettepe University said, “It is obvious that precautions taken for the Covid-19 pandemic would last for a long time. This circumstance highlights the importance of less crowded, individualized educational models in the medical field. For the fields such as orthopedics where practical training and hands-on education are an essential part, Virtual Reality Simulators can be considered as the best solution.

Huri added, “As far as we know this is the first time a study of this sort has been undertaken.  With the shift to VR simulators rapidly increasing in the medical training for several procedures, we wanted to demonstrate that the shift is beneficial to the industry. According to this study, we are able to state that VR Simulators are just as effective as cadavers for training arthroscopic procedures.”

Beat Rechsteiner, Senior Director International Business at VirtaMed, commented, “Our ArthroS™ simulator is used for training throughout the world and we are convinced that it is an essential training solution, particularly under the constraints of COVID-19.  This study demonstrates that now is the time to invest in simulator training and benefit from training residents quicker, safer, and with advanced proficiency.”

Read the full study here.

SourceVirtaMed
Medical Device News Magazinehttps://infomeddnews.com
Medical Device News Magazine provides breaking medical device / biotechnology news. Our subscribers include medical specialists, device industry executives, investors, and other allied health professionals, as well as patients who are interested in researching various medical devices. We hope you find value in our easy-to-read publication and its overall objectives! Medical Device News Magazine is a division of PTM Healthcare Marketing, Inc. Pauline T. Mayer is the managing editor.

More News!

The Evolut ™ FX+ TAVR system leverages market-leading valve performance with addition of larger windows to facilitate coronary access
The study was an analysis of AstraZeneca’s Phase 2 52-Week clinical trial of tralokinumab in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The patient data from the trial was processed with Brainomix’s e-Lung tool. The tool is uniquely powered by the weighted reticulovascular score (WRVS), a novel biomarker that incorporates reticular opacities and vascular structures of the lung.
“Since the algorithm for matching patients with donors is changing across for all organs, this was a prime time to better understand whether transplant team decisions to accept a donated organ varied by patient race and gender,” she said. “We wanted to understand how the process of receiving a transplant after listing varied by race and gender, and the combination of the two, so that steps can be taken to make that process more equitable," said Khadijah Breathett, MD.
The Mount Sinai study found that primary care physicians’ approach reflects a dearth of evidence-based guidance for lung cancer screening shared decision-making in patients with complex comorbidities
This is the first ever transplantation of a genetically engineered porcine kidney into a living human recipient.

By using this website you agree to accept Medical Device News Magazine Privacy Policy

Exit mobile version